Gating AI-assisted deploys
Velocity from agents is only safe when evidence is enforced — not when a reviewer skims prose.
Why informal review fails
AI-assisted diffs can be large, cross-cutting, and syntactically valid while still breaking routes, schema, or policy. Human review alone cannot guarantee coverage at machine speed — you need structured outputs keyed off the same snapshot your automation supplies.
What Verixet enforces instead
For the thesis on agent velocity vs invariants, read why AI-generated code needs deployment gates.
Engines return evidence-backed JSON: scores, missing context, and explicit verdicts. The Workflow Gate combines audit, planning, and validation so CI can assert on safe_to_deploy instead of parsing comments or logs.
Policy modes without losing signal
Start in advisory mode while you tune snapshots and thresholds. Move to blocking or strict when merges must fail closed — the same engines run; only the HTTP posture changes.